Maritime Cybersecurity Insights
Aggregating the full spectrum of maritime cybersecurity — E26/E27 compliance, OT security, threat intel and scenarios: clause maps, fail-point guides, whitepapers and cases; every asset downloadable, linkable or shareable.
Filter by audience
- Clause mapEquipment vendorDesign house
IACS UR E27 Clause Map
All 41 E27 security capabilities laid out by IEC 62443-3-3 family and cross-referenced with CBS category, so you can see which clauses apply to you.
View asset - WhitepaperEquipment vendorYard / ownerDesign house
E26 & E27 Cyber Resilience Compliance Whitepaper
A shareable primer: where E26/E27 came from, when it became mandatory, the two submission routes, and the 10 document types you must file.
View asset - BriefingEquipment vendorYard / ownerDesign house
Who Enforces: Port State Control, Class Societies & the USCG
Cyber compliance isn't just on paper: PSC checks it through the ISM Code, class societies review and certify, and the USCG's 2025 rule puts real money behind it — three enforcement tracks in one view.
View asset - ScenarioEquipment vendorYard / owner
Scenario: Engine-Room Monitoring Submission
Using an engine-room monitoring system, walk the journey from scoping and gap assessment through remediation to submission evidence — and see what each step delivers.
View asset - BriefingEquipment vendorYard / ownerDesign house
IMO 2021: How Maritime Cyber Risk Management Began
Before E26/E27, the IMO folded cyber risk into the safety management system. Understand the watershed between the “in-service” and “new-build” logics.
View asset - Incident reviewEquipment vendorYard / ownerDesign house
Maritime Cyber Incidents, Reviewed
From Maersk crippled by NotPetya to a DNV ransomware hit affecting a thousand ships — a few public cases that show what maritime cyber risk actually looks like.
View asset - ExplainerEquipment vendorYard / ownerDesign house
Why Shipboard OT Security Isn't IT Security
IT protects confidentiality first; OT protects availability first — shipboard OT inverts the priorities. Grasp that, and E27 starts to make sense.
View asset - Fail pointsEquipment vendorYard / owner
Top Five Fail Points
The five most common ways E27 submissions fail — each mapped to the capability family it breaks and how to fix it. Self-audit before FAT and class witnessing.
View asset
Methodology depth (supporting reference)
- Clause domains decomposed
- 14Clause domains decomposed
- Fail points catalogued
- 21Fail points catalogued
- Submission evidence types covered
- 18Submission evidence types covered
- Shipboard systems covered
- 8Shipboard systems covered
These figures are derived programmatically from how published assets cover the 8 shipboard systems — a supporting reference, not an official class-society statistic.
This asset's reading of IACS UR E26/E27 is for reference only; formal compliance requirements and classification are decided by the class society.